WebMD Blogs
Icon

Eye On Vision

Dr. Lloyd's blog has now been retired. We appreciate all the wisdom and support Dr. Lloyd has brought to the WebMD community throughout the years. Continue to get the latest information about vision by visiting the Eye Health Center. Talk with others about vision on the Eye & Vision Health: Member Discussion message board.

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Speed Reading: Pick up the pace!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Video monitors play an increasingly large part in our lives. Many folks do far more reading from the computer screen than from printed text like books and newspapers.

Are you a speed reader? If you read from a computer monitor the answer is probably "No!"

Numerous vision researchers have shown that people read text much slower on computer screens: 28 percent slower.

Here are some explanations why reading text off a monitor takes more time:

  • distance between the reading material and the reader
  • angle of the reading material
  • character shape
  • resolution
  • characters per line
  • lines per page
  • words per page
  • inter-line spacing
  • actual size of characters
  • inter-character spacing
  • margins
  • contrast between characters and background
  • posture of the reader
  • familiarity with the medium
  • distortion in corners
  • method for text advancement (scrolling vs. turning pages)

So, if you are in a big hurry you might want to print that on-screen text before reading it!

Related Topics: Tips for general good vision, Office Ergonomics

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 10:01 PM

Refractive Surgery: Not All Flaps Are the Same
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

You really don't want to know what the acronym LASIK stands for. It is an outrageous mouthful. Its little brother LASEK is not much better. Other than an inarticulate vocabulary, there are significant differences between these two popular laser refractive surgical procedures.

Both LASIK and LASEK create a tissue flap that is elevated before laser energy is applied to the clear cornea. LASIK creates a thin slice of deeper corneal stroma. Think about an ordinary hamburger bun. Most of the time the bun is split 90% across, leaving one portion of the top of the bun hinged to the lower half. The LASIK flap is just like that. As previously discussed in this blog, the LASIK flap never heals. The LASIK flap is vulnerable to trauma, dislodgment, even separation from the cornea.

This is where LASEK differs from LASIK.

LASEK achieves similar vision correction without creating that corneal stromal flap. Instead, the LASEK flap is limited to the superficial corneal epithelial cells. Once the laser is applied the epithelial 'carpet' is repositioned and the cells immediately begin to heal, firmly reattaching themselves to the cornea. In 5 days or so an entire new population of cells will replace the epithelial flap like it never happened. With LASEK there is no long-term concern over a 'lost flap'.

If you are considering refractive surgery make sure you are fully familiar with all treatment options. This includes the option to decline any surgery.


Related Topics: Eye Health, Common Vision Problems

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 2:11 PM

Friday, February 24, 2006

Legally Blind?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Every so often someone asks me about Legal Blindness.

Not too long ago a legal blindness determination was a pretty big deal because folks could qualify for an added exemption on their federal income taxes. That provision has since been eliminated.

Here are the USA standards for legal blindness:

Visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in the better eye with corrective lenses (20/200 means that a person at 20 feet from an eye chart can see what a person with normal vision could see at 200 feet)

-or-

Visual field restriction to 20 degrees diameter or less (tunnel vision) in the better eye. Folks with advanced glaucoma, retinal degenerations, and neurologic disorders usually qualify under this criterion.

Visit WebMD to learn more about vision testing.


Remember to apply the 'better eye' rule. If a person is totally blind (no light perception) in one eye yet can see better than 20/200 in the other eye there is no legal blindness. A person may even be missing an eye and not qualify as legally blind!


Driving vision standards require 20/40 vision or better in at least one eye. Yes, you can get a driver's license even if you have monocular vision.
You'd be surprised to learn how many one-eyed drivers there are out there on the highway!

Related Topics: Vision Problems, Eye Health

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 1:04 AM

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Safe Driving at Night
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Here's another little secret you should know. Many excellent daytime drivers are dangerous behind the wheel after sunset! Healthy drivers included, not just folks with progressive cataracts or retinal diseases. Do you have more trouble driving in the dark? The reason may be as clear as night and day.

Daylight vision is also called photopic vision. Bright photopic light (red and yellow wavelengths) stimulates the central photoreceptors of the retina - the cells responsible for crisp, precise visual tasks like reading. Dimmer environments (blues and green wavelengths) utilize scotopic vision - peripheral photoreceptors that provide far less precise vision.

Let's simplify things: Bright lights wipeout night vision whereas darkness prevents your critical central retina from seeing.


Some auto designers attempt to override the Laws of Nature. Although bright oncoming headlights can temporarily dazzle the driver, a stylish dashboard instrument panel may cause a bigger problem.



Sexy sportscars with bright white or bright red instrument panel illumination can actually wipeout your night vision when it's needed most as the driver gazes upwards to look ahead in the dark. Traditional blue-green illumination was not chosen by accident. Large blue-green numbers and indicators can be read without jeopardizing critical central vision.


Did you know that many nearsighted myopes become more myopic in the dark? We call this 'night myopia'. Night vision is also affected by normal pupillary dilation that occurs in the dark. Big pupils can induce a variety of optical aberrations. Drivers adapt differently differently to low-light levels, so the dashboard light intensity is adjustable. Thinking about buying a car or truck? Schedule an evening test drive to make sure the vehicle offers optimal night viewing.


Related Links:Vision Problems in Aging Adults, Understanding Vision Problems

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 1:02 AM

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

10 Things to Know About Lazy Eye
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

1. The medical term for lazy eye is Amblyopia.

2. Amblyopia is a healthy eye that does not see well. Intrinsic eye disorders (cataract, corneal scarring, etc.) can worsen amblyopia.

3. Amblyopia always begins in childhood, usually before age 3.

4. Don't blame the eyes! The brain decides whether or not an eye becomes amblyopic. Remember, the eye is healthy!

5. When a conflict exists the brain is forced to make a choice between processing visual information from the better of the two eyes.

6. Visual conflicts include crooked eyes (strabismus), blockage of the normal visual pathway (as in a dense infantile cataract), or a marked difference in the refractive power of the two eyes (as an example: one eye nearsighted and the other farsighted).

7. A child can have a densely amblyopic eye and not complain.

8. Visual penalization of the better eye is the recommended treatment for lazy eye. Methods include patching the better eye or administration of atropine ointment to blur the better eye so as to force the lazy eye back to work. A specific treatment schedule is customized for each child's needs.

9. Parents of amblyopic children need to be very aggressive towards enforcing amblyopia treatment. The eye doctor educates and encourages. It is a daily parental responsibility that cannot be neglected. The earlier treatment is started the better the chances for good visual recovery.

10. Beyond age 7 (and certainly after age 11) the chances of significant reversal of lazy eye are very poor. By then the brain's circuitry has reached maturation. No matter how many times treatment fails, start again and commit to do the best job possible. A lifetime of good eyesight hangs in the balance!

Related Topics: Never Too Late to Treat Kids with Lazy Eye, Vision Exams for Infants and Children

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 11:45 PM

Website Simulates Visual Symptoms
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Here's a helpful website that may help you explain your visual symptoms to your eye doctor.

Click here to understand the difference between blur, glare, and ghosting. Many other visual phenomena are demonstrated.

Visitors can adjust the severity of each aberration from mild to wild. This interactive website also exhibits what patients are likely to experience with different eye disorders.

One unexpected feature of this website is a prominent notice on the home page offering to provide (sell) simulations for courtroom use. Hey, everybody has a right to make a living!



Related Topics: WebMD Eye Health Center

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 4:00 PM

Prescribe Pot for Glaucoma?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Every so often somebody asks me about marijuana. No, they don't want to sell me some weed, rather, they want to know if I can prescribe them some!

The practice of ophthalmology and controlled substances go way back. Did you know that the first legitimate medical use of cocaine occurred in 1885? Cocaine drops were administered for local anesthesia during eye surgery. Eye specialists also used topical cocaine eyedrops to establish (or refute) the diagnosis of Horner's Syndrome - an interruption of sympathetic nerve fibers to the eye.

Many glaucoma medications work by reducing the production of eye fluid (aqueous) and/or accelerating its drainage from the eye. For over a decade researchers have known that the active ingredient in marijuana (tetrahydrocannabinol-THC) can lead to a pressure reduction in the eye.

So, dude, should all glaucoma patients start lightin' up?

Scientists want to create chemical analogs, drugs that simulate THC's chemical activity without the psychoactive high. Best data to date shows that THC will reduce the intraocular pressure, but not as much (nor as consistently) as other proven medications. Volunteer patients using topical THC eyedrops do not get high, horny, or hungry.

There already exist many more consistently effective eyedrops that are proven to lower pressure and reduce the risk of glaucoma damage. Given that doctors want to offer their patients the best treatment, there is no moral justification to prescribe an inferior drug.


Related Topics: Supreme Court Rules Against Medicinal Marijuana, Glaucoma

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 11:56 AM

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

New Options for Cataract Surgery Patients
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Remember 35mm cameras? Most of them are collecting dust with the popularity of easy-to-use digital cameras. Anyway, about the 35mm camera...if you removed the lens from the camera body you were unable to take clear photos. And so it is with cataract surgery. By removing the cloudy lens through cataract surgery the eye immediately loses about 18 diopters of focusing power, roughly one-third of the eye's total focusing power.

For the past 20 years eye surgeons have relied on an artificial intraocular lens (IOL) implant to correct for the loss of focusing power. IOLs are available in a range of optical powers to match the needs of individual patients, however, until recently, IOLs offered one optical correction: distance or near. Most IOL recipients still wore glasses after their surgery to help with reading.

Now things are changing.

Multifocal IOLs are now available. The FDA has determined that they are safe and effective. The leading multifocal IOLs have pleasing names like Crystalens, ReSTOR, and ARRAY.

Unfortunately, Medicare has not kept up with change.

Although there are a few exceptions, most patients receiving a multifocal IOL will incur a huge out-of-pocket expense, typically exceeding $2000 per eye. Medicare and most private insurers only reimburse for the standard, less-expensive monofocal IOL.

If you are considering cataract surgery make sure you clearly understand exactly which charges you will be expected to pay out of your own pocket. Many seniors don't have $2000 to spend for medical devices that are totally elective. Speak with your surgeon to determine if your situation qualifies for multifocal IOL reimbursement.

Related Topics: Should I Have Cataract Surgery?, Vision Problems in Aging Adults

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 2:14 PM

Friday, February 17, 2006

Natural Supplements: Health or Hype?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Everybody has heard about Saw Palmetto, right? It's a natural substance touted to prevent prostate enlargement in men (abbreviated BPH). Most men over 60 have some form of BPH and the urinary symptoms that accompany the condition.

Just this week a large study published in the New England Journal of Medicine discredited any medicinal value of Saw Palmetto. (Full Report)

This product made it into the mainstream marketplace without rigorous proof of any genuine benefits. Most clinical studies were short term with few participants. Oftentimes there was no placebo or inadequate 'blinding' to keep the study objective. There remains no concensus regarding how the 'active ingredient' in Saw Palmetto works!

So you ask, why is the WebMD 'Eye Guy'talking about prostate and palmetto?

Many folks consume a variety of vitamins, nutrients, herbals, botanicals, and antioxidants because they believe these supplements will prevent aging changes to the eyes and preserve clear vision. Will there soon be more stories to dispute the benefits of Vitamins A, C, E as well as zinc?

Fortunately, eye care will not be similarly blindsided.

A huge, expensive, well-designed, objective and controlled clinical study has been underway for many years. It is sponsored by the National Eye Institute and it is called AREDS (Age-Related Eye Disease Study).

AREDS studied thousands of people and the healthy effects of vitamins and zinc in the prevention of Macular Degeneration. Review the findings here. NEI also reports that Lutein has received intense scrutiny and has been found to be beneficial to preserving eyesight. NEI is organizing more clinical studies to verify the efficacy of other supplements.

Related Topics: Food-aceuticals: Drink - and Eat - to Your Health, , Nutrition Advice You Can Take to Heart

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 11:41 AM

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Astigmatism 101: Soup spoon vs. Teaspoon
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

One of the most mystical terms used in ophthalmology is astigmatism.
Well, what is it?

Uncorrected astigmatism is a frequent reason why people cannot see clearly.
Okay, but what is it?

Astigmatism keeps many people from wearing soft contact lenses.

Enough already! What is astigmatism?!?

First things first. Let's start with a perfect uncorrected 20/20 eye. This eye clearly "sees" an object because the eye is precisely focusing light rays that come from the object. Follow me so far?

The outer surface of the normal, healthy, clear cornea is smooth, even, and round. We call the surface spherical because its shape is just like half of a sphere - like half a racquetball. We've previously mentioned that two-thirds of the eye's focusing power occurs along the front surface of the cornea. Curvature of the cornea contributes greatly to that focusing power.

Light rays bombard the cornea from every conceivable angle: straight down the middle (axial), horizontal, vertical, and every oblique angle in-between. Since the curvature of the spherical cornea is uniform and identical along every conceivable meridian (any line that passes through the center of the cornea and connects opposite points at the edge of the cornea, like 0 and 180 degrees - better known as 3 and 9 o'clock), every ray is equally focused.

What happens when it is not?

At long last. Astigmatism loosely means "not spherical"*. Eyes (corneas) with astigmatism have an uneven curvature. Let's stick with the ball analogy. Imagine cutting a football in half tip-to-tip along its long axis. Right away you can appreciate how the curvature of this 'hemi-football' is flatter along the longer meridian and steeper along its shorter meridian. For all nonspherical surfaces there is a steepest meridian and a flattest meridian. The difference in curvature between these two meridians creates cylindrical error, the quantity of astigmatism.

Want to easily demonstrate some astigmatism on yourself? Look at your reflection in a round silver soup spoon and compare what you see with an oval teaspoon.

Don't be frustrated if you had trouble absorbing all of this information. Next time we're together we'll apply some of these optics to everyday real-world vision correction.


* Here's the fine print: The etymology for astigmatism more accurately means "without a point". Spherical surfaces focus the image at a single point. Uneven curvature prevents that from happening. Less frequently, the crystalline lens can also generate some astigmatism.



Related Topics: Eye on New Vision Procedures , Eye Cell Implants Help Parkinson's

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 8:17 AM

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Deceitful Eyes: Awesome Optical Illusions
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take a break from organizing your income taxes and give your eyes a holiday.

Click here to view one of the wildest collections of optical illusions on the Internet. There are both static and animated illusions. Most are accompanied by a brief description of the pertinent visual psychometric principles involved in each illusion. Yawn!

Pick your favorite and tell me about it at our WebMD message board.

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 12:55 AM

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Blindness: Not the End of the Road
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Over the past few weeks there have been several desperate visitors to our WebMD Vision and Eye Disorders Community who have been plagued by chronic eye problems. They report that their doctors have given up. These 'healers' have pronounced, "There's nothing else that can be done for you." That's code for "Please go away." I'm talking about people in pain, people losing their eyesight.

  • There is always something that can be done:
  • If not cure you can slow or halt progress of disease.
  • If you can't halt progress you can palliate.
  • If you can palliate you can, at least, provide comfort.
  • If you can't do ANYTHING you can always care.

Where is this going? I recently had a patient come to my clinic with advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa. Nearly blind in both eyes, you'd never know it from this woman's joyful spirit. After completing my exam I instructed the patient to return in 3 months. The surprised patient remarked, "Why so soon? I usually visit once every year or so?"

I told her that she needs to be at the front of the line - not at the end. With so little precious vision left I need to watch her like a hawk. RP patients can get glaucoma, they certainly get cataracts and many other acquired disorders. Maybe I cannot reverse her RP (nobody can) but more frequent visits will alert the eye doctor to other problems that may jeopardize what little eyesight remains. Besides, periodic visits will preserve a healthy connection between the patient and provider...the absolute core of medical practice.

Related Topics: Coping with Vision Loss, Antibiotic May Prevent Diabetic Vision Loss


Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 1:00 AM

Monday, February 13, 2006

Macular Degeneration: Hope is in the Pipeline
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Age-Related Macular Degeneration is the most common cause of irreversible vision loss in adults over 55. Far more people are affected by ARMD than glaucoma, retinal detachment or tumors.

Until recently focal laser treatment was the only effective way to halt progression of the wet-form of ARMD. That's the dangerous type caused by abnormal blood vessels sprouting underneath the retina. Laser energy destroys retinal tissue to obliterate the vessels, a terrible tradeoff.

Advances in medical therapy have revolutionized the treatment approach to ARMD. Here's a rundown:

Visudyne (Verteporfin, Novartis) was first. It is a light-stimulated drug that attacks the abnormal vessels.

Macugen (Pegaptanib, OSI/Eyetech) and Lucentis (Ranibizumab, Genentech/Novartis) are genetically-engineered antibodies that attack the protein responsible for the abnormal blood vessels. Macugen is already being prescribed. Lucentis is pending final FDA approval.

Heard of
Avastin (Bevacizumab, Genentech)? It is a popular chemotherapy for colon cancer. The active drug in Avastin is chemically similar to Lucentis except it is already available for use. Some ophthalmologists are now offering Avastin injections to their ARMD patients as an "off-label" alternative. Oh, one other thing, Avastin costs $5.50 per milligram whereas Macugen is a whopping $3,300.00 per milligram. You read right, $3,300.00! Expect to hear more about this controversial subject.

Further up the FDA new drug pipeline there are three other promising ARMD therapies:

  • Retaane (Anecortave acetate, Alcon)
  • Envizon (Squalamine lactate, Genaera)
  • Combretastatin (Synthetic CA4, OXiGENE)

We'll talk more about these newer drugs as they get closer to the medical marketplace.

Just remember, there are options for patients with advanced ARMD. Don't hesitate to ask your eye doctor, "What's new?" The answer may surprise you!

Related Topics: New Macular Degeneration Drug Improves Sight, New Drug Slows Wet Macular Degeneration


Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 1:11 AM

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Bright Lights Make You Sneeze?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

It was a very long day in clinic today. There were many new patients and others who were added on to my full schedule. Most adult patients get a dilated eye exam since it may be their only clinic visit for a year or longer. Dilating the pupils offers me the clearest view of the retina, the part of the exam called ophthalmoscopy. One specific technique, indirect ophthalmoscopy, provides a stereoscopic 3D view of the back of the eye. The only drawback is that it requires the use of a very bright illuminating headlamp - not unlike a coal miner. Maybe you have endured this procedure.

It surprised me today how often my patients sneezed when I began indirect ophthalmoscopy. This well-recognized phenomenon is called photic sneezing. Perhaps 1-in-10 adults overall are susceptible. It seemed to me that many more were sneezing today. Photic sneezing is not dangerous and only happens once per exam.

There are many interesting theories to explain photic sneezing but there remains no consensus. Would it surprise you to learn that a team of Neurologists is researching the genetic inheritance of this peculiar human behavior? Click here to learn more about photic sneezing.

Photic sneezing, another reason why eye doctors maintain such a huge supply of Kleenex in their clinics!


Related Topics:
Preventing Vision Loss, Slew of New Lenses Act Like Real Eyes

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 12:52 AM

Monday, February 06, 2006

Being an Eye Patient in 2006: Revised Job Description
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Familiar with the adjective paternalistic? Its root is pater, Latin for 'father'. The Lord's Prayer (the 'Our Father') would always begin "Pater noster...". Thank you, Sister Mary Loretto, you taught me well!

Medicine used to be very paternalistic. The physician examined you, ordered tests without explanation, and initiated treatment - medical, surgical, maybe both. There was very little dialogue. Most patients didn't complain because they genuinely assumed that the doctor knew what was best and that the doctor would always act in the patient's best interest. That's the way people also felt about their parents. The doctor was almost like a third parent, except instead of giving you an allowance you received a bill!

Health care reform, combined with the economics of managed care, has mostly obliterated all paternalism - both the good aspects and the not-so-good. Patients are reclassified as health consumers although most of my patients cringe when they hear that phrase. The rules have changed and most of you know that.

Click here to read how one doctor is trying to unleash the power of health consumers to improve health care delivery. Because I have been practicing a long time I am uncomfortable putting new burdens on patients. They're sick, they're scared, they already have enough to think about!

But what if it made a real difference in the quality of care and the outcomes?

Maybe among all these changing paradigms (cringe!) there is a place for health consumers to take a more active role. Here's a little secret taught in medical school: Patients are looking for good doctors. At the same time doctors are looking for good patients!

What do I look for in good patients?

= Active listeners

= Helpful historians (notes are cool)

= Folks eager to learn more about their health, not just their diseases

= People brave enough to ask 'why?' at least once per visit

There are many, many more attributes but first I'd like to hear what you think.

As you know, I am unable to respond directly to blog comments, but feel free to take it over to our WebMD Eye & Vision Disorder Community Member Board to kick-up some fresh dirt with a doctor who is still trying to adapt.



Related Topics: Finding Dr Right, Choosing a Health Plan

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 7:04 PM

Sunday, February 05, 2006

Football Refs: Temporary Blindness?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

It's time for Super Bowl XL - bring on the commercials! That's the feeling of many football fans who believe their favorite team was robbed of a chance to be in this year's NFL Championships.

These dissatisfied supporters blame the officials for making bad calls and incorrectly assessing penalties.

Click here to learn why one sportswriter believes blind referees contributed to the worst NFL postseason ever.

Pity the poor referees. For each play they have to be properly positioned, alert, and posess total mastery of the NFL rules in order to make an accurate call:


= Was the receiver out of bounds?

= Are there too many players on the field?

= Which team retrieved that fumble?

Follow your instincts. Published reports claim NFL officials make the correct decision 97% of the time. That's before any coach screams for a challenge replay. The video replay will reverse a referee's call only if it unequivocally refutes the official's judgment. Oftentimes the use of 6 different camera angles still leaves the observer unsure what actually happened.

An alert mind and a precise memory play a role in processing what we see (versus what we think we see, or what we want to see). On a different playing field attorneys know that most witnesses to the same auto accident rarely agree on anything substantive other than the fact that two vehicles collided (or were there 3?)

So, enjoy your Super Sunday. Soon the chaotic pro football season will be over and sports fans can return to a more straightforward, clear cut form of athletic competition: Major League Baseball!



Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 12:29 AM

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Waiting Room Anger Management
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

There have been very robust discussions among WebMD visitors this past week regarding health consumer frustration and anger regarding outpatient clinic experiences. Patients stranded for hours in overcrowded waiting rooms or brave the solitude of chilly exam rooms.

WebMD's Rod Moser started it all with this
candid post to his blog All Ears.

Before you blow a gasket at your next clinic visit you should
read this story about anger research that was published in the Annals of Family Medicine.

Angry people are more prone to become injured, and men (surprise!) are more susceptible than women.

Bottom line: 1) Chill; 2) Live longer!

Related Topics: Is the entire planet stressed out? (Video), Stressed Out? Tips for Finding Balance

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 10:36 AM

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Happy 40th -- Here are your bifocals!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Visual symptoms are some of the earliest telltale reminders of advancing age. Sometimes blurry reading vision predates the first grey hair! Most of us tend to deny these changes until it's nearly impossible to see closeup objects. What's going on?

The medical term for this change in life is called Presbyopia and it is not hard to understand. The healthy eye has two coordinated focusing systems: distance vision (beyond 20 feet, optical infinity) and near vision (another long word, accommodation). At age 5 human beings enjoy peak accommodation and a remarkable agility for shifting focus between far and near. It steadily declines throughout life. By age 40 most folks who do not ordinarily wear glasses start experiencing blurriness while reading because of this progressive loss of accommodation becomes apparent. Most accommodation disappears by age 65.

Farsighted individuals experience this milestone earlier in life -- presbyopia occurs later for nearsighted myopes.

Optics alert! Since the focusing requirement decreases with target distance presbyopes adapt by holding items farther away. Eventually their arms are no longer long enough! Fabricating a second lens to the distance correction provides added near focusing power. Benjamin Franklin introduced the first bifocal eyeglasses. Depending on the specific prescription there may be a blurry intermediate zone (not near, not far) just beyond your reach. In this situation trifocal spectacles or a blended progressive lens will offer a clear image at near, at intermediate distances, and at far away objects.

If you balk at the idea of wearing bifocal spectacles there are multifocal contact lenses and even refractive surgery to eliminate presbyopia.

Related Topics: Slew of New Lenses Act Like Real Eyes, Healthy Diet May Improve Seniors' Vision

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 2:08 PM

The opinions expressed in the WebMD Blogs are of the author and the author alone. They do not reflect the opinions of WebMD and they have not been reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance or objectivity. WebMD Blogs are not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your physician or other qualified health provider because of something you have read on WebMD. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service or treatment. If you think you have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.